“The Many Lives of Catwoman” Shines a Light on DC’s Best Anti-Heroine


[Written by Jeremy Grayson]

As a young child, I didn’t play with many action figures – at least, not from the world of superheroes. Though I obsessed over Superman and Batman from a youthful age, my familiarity with them was limited to comic books and cartoons. I never owned a Superman cape, nor a remote-controlled Batmobile, and my playtime implements were mostly limited to matchbox cars and little plastic farm animals. (The cows crossed the road, forcing the drivers to veer left. It’s more fun than it sounds.)

I only owned one DC Comics-inspired toy during my halcyon days. It was a little purple car with a molded cat’s head on the hood and a tail jutting from the rear bumper. Seated behind the wheel was the notorious Catwoman, dressed in a purple costume and cowl modeled after the one she wore back in the 1950s. When you pushed the Kitty Car, the tail wagged back and forth. Catwoman on the move!

Up until a few days ago, I would have been reluctant to share this story with the world, knowing that it would likely inspire great bouts of shameless mockery. But I feel inspired enough to tell it now. Why? Because I’ve gained a newfound respect for the character, thanks to the new book I’ve just read.

The Many Lives of Catwoman: the Felonious History of a Feline Fatale, written by comics historian Tim Hanley, chronicles the history of the felonious feline from the 1940s to the present day. Covering the development of her comic book incarnation over the decades – from supervillain to supporting character to star of three different ongoing series – as well as her various film and television incarnations, it’s about as thorough as a comics nerd could ask for.

It’s also starkly affecting, given the hidden complexities of its title character. Few women in comics have gone through as many interpretations as Catwoman, not merely in costume or capabilities, but in identity. She’s a hero; she’s a villain; she’s a love interest; she’s a loner; she’s got weird cat powers and is played by Halle Berry in a godawful movie. No individual interpretation is necessarily the “right” one (although I hope most of us can agree that the last one is quite wrong), and it’s become increasingly difficult for writers to nail down her character.

Catwoman also represents perhaps the ultimate conflict of women in comic books: feminism versus objectification. Sometimes her cunning and independence can feel like a symbol of strength; other times, she can come off as male fantasy. Plenty of female comic book characters walk this line, but Catwoman, with her signature skintight costume and whip (not to mention the deep sexual chemistry she shares with one of DC’s most prominent heroes), has fallen into the trap more than most.

Hanley understands the complications present in the character, and charts her progress with an attention to detail rarely afforded to any hero, male or female. As with his previous books, Wonder Woman Unbound and Investigating Lois Lane, he shines light on a DC woman whose history bears more scrutiny than it gets. Improved this time is the scope of the book in relation to the character – Wonder Woman’s publication history is perhaps too expansive to be contained in a single book, while most of Lois’ escapades are still inextricably tied to Superman. But Catwoman strikes just the right balance of history and relevance to fill the book’s 200-odd pages.

With the ever-expanding, ever-rebooting nature of comic books, it’s unlikely there will ever be a “definitive” Catwoman. (Although if forced to pick, I would probably choose the ambiguous thief characterized in Batman: The Animated Series, expertly voiced by Adrienne Barbeau.) But that may not be a bad thing. While her constant reinventions have led to a variety of hits and misses, the best interpretations have turned her one of the most intriguing women in the DC universe.

(I wonder how much that Kitty Car would make on eBay…)

2 thoughts on ““The Many Lives of Catwoman” Shines a Light on DC’s Best Anti-Heroine”

  1. I like that design a lot, but with a few complaints. I’m sure lots of fans don’t want this but I think they should keep the goggles. I always liked the goggles. And the design feels a little uneven since it’s meant to be a more practical and realistic design, but the bright purple and long flowing hair kind of contradict that. It should either be all practical like her current costume, or not practical at all like the 90s design or Batman Returns Catwoman.

    I’d still like to see that costume but with a few changes made.

    And I agree that the main problem with Selina nowadays is her lack of personality. I think writers were/are afraid of making her too energetic or mischievous or flirtatious out of fear of Catwoman being labeled a “male sex fantasy” or some other misguided criticism. Yeah they screwed up with the early New 52 series but that was because of bad writing, the actual tone of the book had some potential and could have set a great precedent for the character with a better writer.

    The goggles are horrendous. Streamline please. Sexy. Back to basics.


    1. You’re referring to the purple costume designed by Jim Balent, right? Yeah, that wasn’t her best look. Still, her ’90s series wasn’t particularly dark or psychological (as opposed to the Newell or Brubaker series), so I think it fits the tone to have a costume that’s more lightly-colored (and thus lighter-hearted).


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s