Wreck-It Ralph

[Review by Jeremy Grayson]

[Writer: Phil Johnston, Jennifer Lee, Rich Moore, Jim Reardon | Director: Rich Moore | Aired: 11/02/2012]

“Man, it must be nice being the good guy.” – Ralph

If you’re of a certain age, you may remember a time when electronic gaming consoles weren’t just a dime-a-dozen. A time when kids would regularly head into town with a bagful of quarters, eager to spend a few hours with Pac-Man and Donkey Kong and Centipede and Space Invaders. A time when arcades flourished, the flashing lights of their myriad games standing out against dimly lit walls and ceilings, beckoning the average youngster to come get lost in the 8-bit wonder of a pixilated world.

If you’re of that age, you may feel a twinge of nostalgia while watching Disney’s Wreck-It Ralph. Sure, the younger generation will enjoy the film, too, and not without reason – Wreck-It Ralph is a funny, heartfelt, superbly-designed film all around – but having that extra sense of recollection to contrast the modern-day world of gaming with that of the past adds an extra dimension to the viewing experience. That’s because Wreck-It Ralph is more than just an enjoyable family flick – it’s also an excellent spotlight on the evolution of video games.

Start with the miniature universe the film expertly crafts. The writers clearly want us to identify with the world of the video-game characters, and many familiar faces pop up in the early scenes. Sonic, Bowser, M. Bison – these and other iconic faces of interactive entertainment give the world Ralph inhabits a distinctly familiar air. But as the film progresses, it slowly shifts its focus over to entirely new characters and environments. Ralph may have some Donkey Kong DNA in him, and the games he treks through are similarly reimagined from other famous properties (Sugar Rush, for example, is a candy-coated Mario Kart). But that’s all part of the plan. The characters and scenarios of Wreck-It Ralph are meant to feel comfortingly familiar, yet distinctly of their own; we comprehend them as video game characters on a par with Link and Kirby, yet we also see them as original characters to get emotionally invested in beyond their gaming roots. (A film about the actual Donkey Kong would have a much more difficult time clearing that second hurdle.)

The moral of Wreck-It Ralph may not be a new one – just be yourself, the film repeatedly asserts – but it filters that moral through a creative new lens. The film is sure we never forget it takes place in a computerized world – several times, for instance, do the characters refer to their regenerative properties – so that we can fully appreciate the clever new take on the day-old message.

Video-game characters, in the long-term, do not change – no matter how a single game may track or alter their storylines, they revert to their initial selves with the literal hit of a reset button. Whereas past Disney films have featured a gridlocked protagonist intent on breaking the mold, never has that mold been as firmly held in place as the one in Wreck-It Ralph.

Ralph (an excellently-cast John C. Reilly) may exist as a villain, but he wants more than anything for his status to change. He’s played thankless antagonist and second banana to Fix-It Felix (30 Rock‘s Jack MacBrayer) for three decades, and wants a chance at playing the hero. It’s an intriguing premise, due to the fact that – barring a serious coding rewrite – there is no way that Ralph could ever become a video-game hero. The film lures us in with this tempting little premise, and before long, it starts overturning every expectation we may have.

Wreck-It Ralph was released a year before Frozen, a Disney film that has become famous for subverting every character type in the book. But in many ways, Ralph feels like a warm-up for Frozen‘s stylistic subversions – we have a villain who makes for a sympathetic protagonist, an affable goof who turns out to be the true villain, and an annoying-yet-lovable sidekick who is revealed to be a princess. That third example is particularly daring – over the last few decades, Disney has almost single-handedly made the inclusion of princesses in animated films into a blatant marketing ploy. But Vanellope von Schweetz (the hilarious Sarah Silverman) is the most unconventional “princess” in the Disney canon – while she spends much of the film unaware that she is the true ruler of Sugar Rush, she shuns her gown and royal stature even after learning of her “true” identity.

These character archetypes are merely mechanisms of the story, but they serve to underscore the film’s crucial theme of stasis. And it’s a theme that extends beyond Ralph’s ultimate understanding and acceptance of the fact that he will always be a villain (which I’ll discuss in a few moments). The concept of stasis in fact becomes a key point in the film’s meticulous analysis of video games.

Back in the ’80s, plenty of video games had clever concepts, but they were fairly simplistic and straightforward – hunt the ducks; shoot the centipede; eat the pellets while avoiding the ghosts. It was a time when pixilated renderings forced gaming designers to show as much as they could in the smallest amount of space. This also meant that stories needed to be simple – there couldn’t be much ambiguity or nuance in the characters, nor much complexity in the stories. Though plenty of these games had their charms, they were two-dimensional in most every sense.

In the decades since, however, video games have grown with the rise of technology. Now we have games with digitally-rendered imagery, complicated stories and detailed characters, and worlds that feel as three-dimensional as our own. There’s no question that video gaming has come a long way as an art form. And no film demonstrates this fact as well as Wreck-It Ralph.

Start with the 80s-designed game of Ralph’s home game. The world of Fix-It Felix consists almost entirely of a tall apartment building, a mud puddle, and a garbage dump. The characters, too, are simplistically rendered, outside of Felix and Ralph – the Nicelanders move in a jerky, almost erratic fashion, their pod-sized little bodies having no genuine fluid motion. (Hats off to the animators for achieving this effect with three-dimensional renditions of these characters.)

Contrast this with the more modern games in the film – Hero’s Duty features multiple characters coexisting in a large-scale battlefront world, complete with a treacherously designed tower filled with ominous cy-bugs. Even more impressive is Sugar Rush, which crafts an entire world of confectionary pun-based landmarks (my favorite: the pit of Nesquik-sand) and stretches without seeming end in every direction.

Even the characters, comparatively speaking, are worlds apart. As the title hero of his game, Fix-It Felix is the most gosh-darn lovable guy you’ll meet, with a perfect smile on his face and nary a coarse word from his mouth. Calhoun, on the other hand, is a heroine far more in line with the terrors of Hero’s Duty – she’s tough, spiteful, and equipped with a tragic backstory. (Her fiancé was killed by a cy-bug at their wedding.) That the film ultimately pairs these two characters in an “opposites attract”-style romance emphasizes the differences between the two heroes, making them as unlikely a Disney coupling as any since Beauty and the Beast.

But the most dramatic differences between then and now occur from our protagonist’s perspective. Ralph experiences a rather rude awakening when he makes the jump from his own game to Hero’s Duty, discovering that the “wrecking” found in modern games is far more extreme than he anticipated. (“I thought this was going to be like Centipede!” he screams at the first-person shooter. “When did video games become so violent and scary?”) Ralph still lives in a bygone era – he spends his day stealing cherries from the original Pac-Man game and attending “BadAnon” meetings with such old-school villains as Bowser and Zangief. So he’s a veritable fish-out-of-water in the modern games, with the only real commonality being the opportunity for him to win a medal.

And that’s the gist, isn’t it? Ralph’s motivations, like his character, are appealingly simple. No matter how complex or intimidating the game, he sees each one as an opportunity to earn a medal – a supposed object of self-validation. Ralph’s willingness to adapt to each new game’s environment in order to obtain this rather simple prize puts him at an alarming parallel with the film’s villain, King Candy… or, in actuality: Turbo.

Who is Turbo? Back in the calcified ’80s, he was the star of the most popular racing game in the arcade. But time, and improved technologies, threatened to dethrone his position. He attempted to dominate a newer racing game, and maintains his monopoly even now as King Candy, the fabricated star of Sugar Rush. Turbo demonstrates the dark side of being a hero – the threat of fame going to one’s head, to the point that the need to be loved usurps logical reasoning. Though several characters express worry throughout the film that Ralph has “gone Turbo,” Ralph’s motivations stem from entirely different roots than that of the popular racing icon.

Like Turbo, Ralph finds himself adjusting to the world of Sugar Rush – yet he never sells his pixilated soul in the process. Turbo rewrote the entire code of Sugar Rush around him, embracing the world of modern games in a demented and disturbing way. Ralph, meanwhile, never feels fully integrated into either Sugar Rush or Hero’s Duty, despite his myriad attempts to fit in. When Turbo, during the film’s climax, transforms into a frightening King Candy/cy-bug hybrid, he more than ever embraces the intimidating features of modern gaming, and Ralph appears more helpless and out-of-touch than ever.

“Thanks to you,” the mutated Turbo boasts to Ralph, “I’m now the most powerful virus in the arcade!” It’s a fitting description on multiple levels – earlier in the film, Calhoun compared cy-bugs to a virus, noting that “They don’t know they’re in a game.” By the film’s climax, Turbo has become so mad with power that he transcends the description of mere video-game character. He has quite definitively become the most realistic threat in the arcade.

But when all is said and done, Turbo is not defeated by an anti-virus program, or a squad of Hero’s Duty soldiers, or any other credible combatant to modern-day video-gaming threats. No, he is defeated by… wrecking. Just like he’s been doing for the last 30 years, Ralph saves the day by wrecking a large construct (in this case, the Mento stalactites of Diet Cola Mountain) before ending up in a giant puddle of mud. (Or chocolate, in this case.)

Ralph’s great heroic feat is boosted – first spiritually, then physically – by Vanellope, who goes through a heroic arc of her own in the film. Though she initially appears to be an irritating antagonist, Vanellope quickly grows into a likable foil for the film’s protagonist, one who injects both levity and heartfelt emotion whenever the need arises. Sarah Silverman’s high-pitched comedic inflection perfectly balances with John C. Reilly’s deep-voiced grumblings, creating a wonderful duo to drive the film. Vanellope is unabashedly rude and immature, but like Ralph, she is driven by the need to prove her worth as a likable video-game character. And like Ralph, she’s a pariah in her own game – shunted out and contemptuously branded by other racers as a “glitch.” (The film has a little too much fun with that word at Vanellope’s expense, though thankfully, the climax avoids any utterances of “The glitch is back!”)

Wreck-It Ralph overplays its hand a bit in world-building as it comes up with an overly complicated reason for why Vanellope should not be allowed to race. Still, the point must be made in order for the final revelation – that she is in reality the star of the game – to be driven home. Vanellope, by this point, has come to enjoy her glitching abilities – as with Ralph, we see how her physical flaw can be turned into a benefit. It’s a development that creatively embellishes the film’s “Be yourself” message, while also rounding out the primary theme of stasis.

By the end of the film, Ralph is essentially back where he began – but with the added benefit of having his game christened as “retro” by the young arcade-goers. It’s a fitting reward for a character who has held his own against the terrors of modern gaming, and has upheld the good faith of classic ’80s games everywhere.

Disney is currently in the midst of a new Renaissance, as evidenced by the invigorated plotting of Tangled, the subversive storytelling of Frozen, and the delicate messaging of Zootopia. Wreck-It Ralph may not have achieved the popularity level of those films, but in its own way, it warrants just as much recognition and appreciation.

Well… not just as much. Great as this film is, it’s still not quite as complex, thoughtful, or effective as Frozen. But that’s a review for another time…

Minor Pros/Cons (+/-)

+ I really love the jerky, erratic way the Nicelanders move. Reminds me a bit of the pigeons’ heads in Bolt.
+ Clyde turning to “edible ghost” form when Ralph says he’s tired of being the villain.
+ Pretty much every metaphor that comes out of Calhoun’s mouth.
+ So, so, so many candy-based puns in Sugar Rush. Don’t start me, or we’ll be here all day.
+ Alan Tudyk does a fun job voicing King Candy, riffing on Ed Wynn while not outright copying him.
+ Ralph “hitting a guy with glasses.”
+ “Dynamite gal… dynamite gal… dynamite gal…”
+ The way characters refer to things like “regenerating” and “bonus levels” as part of their worlds adds so much texture to the story. Bonus points for having Calhoun be consciously “programmed” with the most disturbing backstory in Hero’s Duty.
– What’s with the training montage set to “Shut Up and Drive”? The scene is fun, but the music choice feels out-of-whack with this film.



13 thoughts on “Wreck-It Ralph”

  1. [Note: Boscalyn posted this comment on May 20, 2016.]

    Wreck-It Ralph overplays its hand a bit in world-building as it comes up with an overly complicated reason for why Vanellope should not be allowed to race.

    Ok, but the scene where the Sugar Rush Gang wrecks her adorable little cart wrecked my heart.

    I have to say that the constant references to “regeneration” and “bonus levels” kind of grated and felt a bit too obvious. (Not to mention that “respawn” would probably be the better term here.) My personal favorite bit of worldbuilding is the recurring phrase “top shelf,” which is humorously recontextualized in a video game setting rather than an alcoholic one.

    I also love the ending credits of the film.


  2. [Note: J.C. posted this comment on June 1, 2016.]

    It kind of makes me sad that you’ve gone to all this effort to write this review, and have only received one comment in return.

    I think it’s an enjoyable film, and I’ve always considered the clipped style of animation for some of the (originally) 8-bit characters to be effectively done.

    Absolutely could’ve done without the Rihanna song (the movie suddenly turned into a car commercial for a few minutes).

    I also feel the movie hedged its bets a bit with some of the poopy-humour given to Silverman. There’s cute, and then there’s pandering.

    At any rate, since Lasseter took over as head (or “overseer”, or whatever) of Disney Animation Studios, there’s definitely been an upswing in the quality of their computer-animated fare, going back to at least Bolt, in my estimation (Who’da thought? Something halfway-decent with Miley Cyrus in it.)

    Anyways, this is a good film. But my favourite videogame-themed picture remains Edgar Wright’s Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World, which I found rather ingenious in a number of ways (particularly how much humour is generated through editing and offbeat visual juxtaposition).


  3. [Note: Jeremy G. posted this comment on June 1, 2016.]

    Yeah, Bolt pretty much kicked off the “new Renaissance” period. I’ve enjoyed every film from the studio since then (even the 2011 Winnie the Pooh, which was far funnier than I expected it to be).

    And hey, don’t feel too sad about the lack of comments. Sometimes, lack of feedback is just as important to me as actual feedback, since it tells me what topics do or don’t resonate with readers.


  4. [Note: Boscalyn posted this comment on June 1, 2016.]

    Scott Pilgrim vs the World is so good that I can’t even bring myself to criticize the film on feminist grounds.

    Not that many great video-game themed movies for some reason, even as video games get more and more cinematic.


  5. [Note: J.C. posted this comment on June 2, 2016.]

    I hear some folks complain about the characters in SPvtW not being “likable”, but I don’t really think it matters, as so much of the humour is generated from them, and especially Scott, being oblivious, fickle idiots with one another. And I still think the melancholy underpinning it manages to register. I also credit that film with being the first thing I took note of Brie Larson in: interesting that she was so “glammed up” here, as she’s usually made to look more dowdy in other films.

    They could probably make a good movie out of The Last of Us (pretty pared-down narrative, fairly rich characters), but it’s already kind of a movie already.


  6. [Note: Other Scott posted this comment on June 2, 2016.]

    This is my annual reminder that I did not take my name from Other Scott in Scott Pilgrim vs The World.

    Thus ends the annual reminder.


  7. [Note: Zarnium posted this comment on June 11, 2016.]

    Wreck-it-Ralph is one of my favorite movies. In fact, it’s the only movie that I’ve ever gone to see a second time in theaters. It applies Toy Story style world-building to video games very, very well, and it does a good job of featuring real-world video game cameos without having them overshadow the original characters.


  8. [Note: Flamepillar112 posted this comment on August 22, 2016.]

    I like this movie quite a lot, but I wish they did more with the ‘video game’ setting. I wasn’t expecting it to be all fan service, but to spend the vast majority of the film in a ‘Candy Land meets Mario Kart’ world was pretty disappointing.


  9. [Note: Jeremy G. posted this comment on August 22, 2016.]

    I was disappointed because the trailer implied that Ralph spent the whole film bouncing from one video game to another, when in fact he only spends time in two games total.

    Oh, well. Still fun. And the sequel will supposedly explore the video game world more deeply.


  10. [Note: Flamepillar112 posted this comment on August 22, 2016.]

    That tantalizing villain meeting shows the potential of this universe. Holy shit, is that the villain from Joust? Wow! I really hope the sequel does more with it, because if done right, it could be the new Toy Story.


  11. So I got the opportunity to rewatch this today, and for all of its merits (of which their are plenty), I can’t help but agree with Flamepillar112 when he claims a certain amount of disappointment in having Ralph basically take root in Sugar Rush for the lion’s share of the film. The essential reason for this is as follows:

    As I mentioned in my defence of [i]Sucker Punch[/i] (which no-one seemed to take me up on), I think a genuine video game-esque movie should offer up the possibility of a kind of hub system of different locations and scenarios, especially when [i]Wreck-It Ralph[/i] is promising entirely different games, not just levels. Also, a range of different games would offer up a variety of different backdrops and therefore aesthetic opportunities. Now when I caught a bit of [i]Cars 2[/i] at Christmas, I quickly remembered why I seem to be more fond of it than most: the attention to detail in the backgrounds is astounding, and they really feel like lived-in real-world locales (this is how I eventually realised I wasn’t as taken as I expected with [i]Tokyo Godfathers[/i] – it’s all set around nondescript green-grey buildings). Because most games are essentially imitations of real pursuits (driving, shooting, fighting, etc), their atmosphere becomes less immersive and more generic when you’re a spectator as opposed to participant, and soon the world of Sugar Rush ends up riffing a lot more on confectionery than video games. More time in the generic murk of Hero’s Duty would test the eyeballs, methinks.

    But largely, still a huge amount of fun and well-observed on the subversion of the princess trope. Other minor pros for me: Sonic getting hit by the escape pod as Ralph hurtles into Sugar Rush, Ryu appearing in the background in Tapper as promise and: “Dana.” “[i]Deanna[/i].”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s